Saturday, January 4, 2014

Bicycle Thieves

Film: Bicycle Thieves (1948, 82 min)         Dir: Vittorio De Sica                   Script: Cesare Zavattini


Bicycle Thieves (1948) on IMDb


My Rating: 9/10


Synopsis (my way)

Antonio’s Character in Bicycle thieves of a poor father struggling to get his family together after the war, is the perfect example of an evolving character who goes through a self-enlightening process in just one day.
Antonio is an honest person, who is jobless and still strongly believes in the society and the institutions of police, law and work. He also has utter disbelief and disregard for superstitions and discourages his wife in the beginning.
By the end of the film, as a result of the long and tiring chase for the stolen bicycle, on which his life depended, he has had many experiences that tears him apart and help his character develop as he goes through different situations and social institutions of church, police station, the trade union, and various other such everyday circumstances, which are somehow not that simple and assisting anymore.
He is forced, as a last chance, to visit a fortune teller to ask about his bicycle. Also, he doesn't believe as much as he did in the police anymore, and in the end he himself, as if in a vicious circle of wrongdoings, is forced to steal a bicycle as a last recourse, only to be caught and beaten up, and let go of only because of the presence of his son, in whose eyes he seems to have fallen. However, that is not the case for his son understands the father’s dilemma and shares his pain. This is perhaps symbolic that the New Generation forgives their ancestors for the pains of War, and the last scene of holding hands signifies that they would go hand in hand to mend the destruction.

What is the film about ?

Some will tell you that it is mainly a film about the relationship between a father and his son, soon after the war days in Italy. They would also tell you that it is an elaborate tale in which father and son are put into a tumultuous condition where the task at hand, of finding the stolen bicycle is of prime importance.
However, this is only partially correct, and the description couldn't be more wrong.

Though I wouldn't blame the person. Years of Hollywood movie going and seeing the almost larger than life story of a larger than life character going through super human and unabashedly exaggerated circumstances is what draws this lofty yet narrow conclusion. 

No. This film is about a trivial side story of a newspaper. A petty crime story involving a stolen bicycle that deserves not more than 2 lines on the sideliner of the dullest page of a newspaper. It is a story woven around the lives of the most insignificant and apparently invisible characters of Italy. Yet, it is through these characters that De Sica introduces the society and the state of affairs in Italy. The brilliance and ingenuity of the film lies in its making. Being one of the most polished Neo Realist films, it is made in true Neo Realist ways. Shot on location with previously unknown faces, Bicycle Thieves manages to bring out the reality of Italy, and thus achieve the objective of Neo Realism. The Most important thing though, is the Layers of action achieved in the film. Unlike most of other films, and in stark contrast to Hollywood film where only the central action and characters were scripted and there was an almost complete lack of anything in the background, here, scripting was done in three layers: . The Foreground, the Mid ground, and the Background. For this, the film can be seen three times seeing only one of the layers at a time. The film was less about the two main characters and more about the society they were living in. Vittorio De Sica’s remarks and views of the society and institutions of superstition, church, marriage, trade union, etc. can be seen at every juncture.  

Verdict: See the Film for its brilliance.

DID YOU KNOW?

Satyajit Ray saw ‘Bicycle Thieves’ 36 times, and this is what inspired him to finally start making films. In fact, he also said that if he will ever make ‘Pather Panchali’, he will make it in the way this was made. Such was the effect of this film on the best Director of Indian Cinema.

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

What this Blog will have

Well, another explanation post. 

This blog is like my personal diary that I'll use for keeping a record. Till now, I have written quite a few articles and reviews on films, both on paper and digitally, but they are very scattered. At first, I'll convert them to digital formats and put them up here. Secondly, I'll write reviews about films that I see from now on, and I’ll keep adding them to the list, and finally, I'll pour out my thoughts here.

So this will have:

  • -         Reviews of old films;
  • -         Reviews of new films;
  • -         My thoughts on filmmaking;
  • -         Collection of my articles related to cinema;
  • -         My personal journal.


Hello World!

So hello world!

Today, 1st of Jan, 2014, this blog comes into existence. This post will serve as an introduction to what this is all about, what to expect, and me in general as a Cinephile.

Well, I am your usual college student, who happens to have a flair for writing, and is in absolute love with cinema. To say that I love watching films is an understatement. I Eat films, I sleep films, and I devour films. Yet, this craziness is very recent, and I never thought this way 2 years back. What changed? I got into college.

I study BMS (B.Sc. in Media Science) and out of various fields like journalism, radio, television, print, acting, theatre, etc., I think my heart’s stuck on Film-making. It somehow makes me feel alive and brings a glow inside. So here I am, that's what this blog is all about, to let out that awesomeness I feel inside, and spread it throughout the world, or whoever I can infect.

As a personal experience, till now I've delved deep into the past of films, it's journey and different movements that shaped the face of film-making as we see it today, and into the great Grand Masters of Cinema. These two were very deeply interlinked, and the journey has been quite eye-catching, literally. The French New Wave, the Italian Neo Realism, the German Expressionism, Surrealism in Cinema, etc., everything has helped shape the now Global Language of Cinema. 

Perhaps more than everything else, the biggest change in me has been the 'eye-opening' that I've gone through. From seeing and appreciating the kind of films I did as a child to today, I have gone through quite a revolution myself. I've learned to differentiate the good from the bad, and understand the meaning of Cinema as a language, a medium with magic at the roots of its very inception, because what is a film? It’s a magic trick which makes you believe that a series of still images are actually moving images. That is why it’s called a Movie. I call it Magic. 

A picture collage of the Grand Masters of Cinema will always be there at the bottom of this page, as they are always at the bottom of my work and heart. See how many you can identify! (I noticed Satyajit Ray first.)

Psst, did I tell you? I'm kind of, sort of, a filmmaker myself? Just made a short silent-fiction film, Auteur style, and a short documentary, classic style.